- Take these ideas…please
- SinglesMob: An app for turning parties into mixers
- NameRater: A search tool for evaluating a possible name change
- Rain swag for the farmers market
- Butt-crack mural: Rethinking self-judgement
- YouDrawIt: The shopping engine that lets you drive
- 12-Step Social Media Scanner & Intervention Bot
- The Genzlingerizer: An app to enhance offline reading (and an IFTTT workaround)
- Blackout ribbon: Avoiding grim news and spoilers
- ShoeCamp: An (imaginary) unconference for the footwear-obsessed
- ClickCentral: a web app for tracking clicks on all tweeted links
- Unstoppable Timer: mobile app wanted
- Talk back to Vancouver’s rain on Twitter
- Hanger card: How to have sex in the shower
- Wouldn’t it be awesome if we had this site or hashtag?
- Genius grants for inspired groups of collaborators
- App: Running late
- Magic browser plugin for retroactive logins across open tabs
During a planning call for Participedia today, I actually stepped out of character and endorsed the idea of building functionality only if actually needed. As I confessed to my colleagues, I secretly prefer the approach to building as much as cool stuff as possible — an instinct I do my best to resist, since scope and feature creep is one of the most common pitfalls of web development. Mack Hardy, who leads the development team, summarized that sentiment with a single phrase:
“Wouldn’t it be awesome if…”
To which I say: Wouldn’t it be awesome if there were a site that invited people to complete the sentence, “Wouldn’t it be awesome if….”? The output might be inspired by twistori, so you’d get a site that looked roughly like this:
Of course you could do the same kind of thing with a Twitter hashtag. #WouldntItBeAwesomeIf we did that?
Recent Comments